Peer-Reviewed Research

Aerated Water Irrigation (Oxygation) Benefits to Pineapple Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Crop Health

The peer-reviewed field research that powers our diagnostic platform.

AUTHORS

J. Dhungel, S.P. Bhattarai, D.J. Midmore

INSTITUTION

Central Queensland University, Australia

PUBLISHED IN

Advances in Horticultural Science, 2012, 26(1): 3–16

FIELD TRIAL PERIOD

2007–2011 (4 years, 2 harvest cycles)

WHAT WE FOUND

The study in plain language

Pineapple roots need oxygen to function — but drip irrigation can create waterlogged zones that starve them of it. We tested whether injecting air into the irrigation water (a technique called oxygation) could solve this problem at a commercial pineapple farm in Queensland, Australia.

Over 4 years and two full harvest cycles, we compared three treatments: aerated drip irrigation (oxygation), standard drip irrigation (control), and no irrigation at all. The results were clear — oxygation produced larger fruits, healthier roots, and less disease, while using water more efficiently.

The yield increase came from bigger individual fruits — not more fruits per plant. Root biomass nearly doubled, soil oxygen levels stayed higher, and Phytophthora (the most damaging pineapple disease in Australia) was reduced by more than 70% compared to non-irrigated crops.

This wasn't a lab experiment — it was a 2.15-hectare commercial field trial with 7 replications per treatment, analyzed over 39 months of crop growth.

KEY FINDINGS

Numbers that speak for themselves

+44%

Total Fruit Yield Increase

Oxygation increased total pineapple yield to 133.7 t/ha compared to 92.8 t/ha for the control — across both main and ratoon crops.

3%

Phytophthora with Oxygation

Phytophthora infestation dropped to just 3% of plants with aerated irrigation, compared to 4.9% (control) and 10.5% (no irrigation).

+20%

Irrigation Water Use Efficiency

IWUE increased to 52.98 t/ML with oxygation compared to 44.23 t/ML for the control — more crop per drop of water.

+79%

Root Biomass Increase

Oxygation nearly doubled root biomass (1056 vs 582 g/m²) in the main crop, driving greater nutrient uptake and plant resilience.

YIELD DATA

Fruit yield comparison (t/ha)

Combined main crop and ratoon crop yields across all treatments.

Oxygation (Aerated SDI)

Total yield
133.7 t/ha
Marketable
73.3 t/ha

Control (SDI, no aeration)

Total yield
106.4 t/ha
Marketable
69.2 t/ha

No Irrigation

Total yield
90.4 t/ha
Marketable
65.9 t/ha

Source: Table 8, Dhungel et al. (2012). Adv. Hort. Sci. 26(1): 3–16.

DISEASE MANAGEMENT

Phytophthora infestation rates

Percentage of plants showing Phytophthora symptoms (fruit and crown rot) across treatments.

3.0%

Oxygation

Lowest infestation

4.9%

Control SDI

Standard drip

10.5%

No Irrigation

Highest infestation

Why this matters: Phytophthora is one of the most costly diseases in pineapple production. Non-irrigated plants developed shallow, surface-level root systems with poor anchorage, leading to crop lodging and root damage — making them more vulnerable to infection during wet periods. Oxygation promoted deeper, healthier root systems that resisted disease even in wetter-than-average seasons (total rainfall: 4,250 mm over the trial).

Source: Table 1, Dhungel et al. (2012). P < 0.001, LSD = 1.379.

METHODOLOGY

Rigorous field trial design

This was a large-scale, multi-year commercial field trial — not a laboratory experiment.

Duration

4 years (2007–2011)

Trial Area

2.15 hectares

Replications

7 per treatment

Design

Randomized block

Crop

Pineapple (var. GC1)

Location

Yeppoon, QLD, Australia

Soil Type

Calcareous sandy loam

Aeration Method

Mazzei venturi injector (12% air by volume)

What was measured

Soil oxygen concentration (fiber-optic sensors)

Soil moisture at 10–60 cm depths

Root biomass and dry matter partitioning

Leaf gas exchange (photosynthesis, transpiration)

Canopy light interception

Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD)

Fruit yield, size, weight, and quality

Phytophthora infestation rates

Soil compaction and bulk density

Soil microbial activity (FDA analysis)

Irrigation and gross water use efficiency

Soil chemical properties (N, P, K, pH)

ECONOMICS

The cost-benefit case for oxygation

AU$500

Add-on cost per hectare

Mazzei injector + fittings for existing SDI

AU$3,750

Additional return per hectare

From 7.5 t/ha yield gain at AU$500/t

7.5x

Return on investment

In the first crop cycle alone

Based on data from the paper's cost-benefit analysis section. SDI infrastructure lasts 15 years covering 5 crop cycles with potential additional returns of AU$18,750/ha.

FROM RESEARCH TO APPLICATION

This research is the foundation of our diagnostic platform

The oxygen stress thresholds, soil oxygen dynamics, root zone relationships, and yield response data from this study — along with over 15 years of Dr. Dhungel's broader research — are encoded into the algorithms that power every diagnostic report on Oxygen Stress.

When you run a diagnostic, you're not getting generic advice. You're getting recommendations grounded in published, peer-reviewed field data.

CITE THIS PAPER

Full citation

Dhungel, J., Bhattarai, S.P., & Midmore, D.J. (2012). Aerated water irrigation (oxygation) benefits to pineapple yield, water use efficiency and crop health. Advances in Horticultural Science, 26(1), 3–16.

Also referenced: Dhungel, J. et al. (2009). Oxygation enhanced pineapple yield and quality. Acta Horticulturae, 889, 551–556.

See how this research applies to your crops

Run a free diagnostic powered by the same science behind this peer-reviewed study.

No credit card required5-minute assessmentResearch-backed